In spite of all the rhetoric* from ID proponents, there is nothing to Intelligent Design. Nothing, nada, zip, zilch.
How do I know they have nothing?
It’s really very simple. Read lots of ID proponents and supporters. Read lots of their writing.
What do you not see?
Think about it for a second… as prolific writers as many of that group are, don’t you think that if they had anything that actually supported Intelligent Design, any research data, any lab experiments, anything, that they would be trumpeting it as loudly and as often as possible?
Every post, every comment one every blog, every signature would have the evidence and links to it.
And that’s the one thing you don’t see in any intelligent design writing. None of it. Oh sure, they talk about maths and sciency sounding words and maybe hash out some philosophical implications, but they don’t have any data. None.
They don’t have any tests. They don’t have anything.
After almost two decades, there is still nothing that any ID proponent can point to and say, “See, this data indicates design, because this value of this experiment is x, where a value of y would indicate evolution.”
It really is as simple as that.
* and I use that specific word for a reason.